Hilary Putnam, <i>Reason, Truth and History</i>
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
REPLY TO STEPHEN WHITE hilary putnaM
W i responded to stephen White’s deep and elegant lecture in rome, i said that i agreed with his transcendental argument and i do. it is a profound contribution to the discussion of the epistemology and phenomenology of perception. and apart from one minor textual issue having to do with William James,1 was so convinced by that lecture that i had no criticism to voice. But on a subsequent close...
متن کاملHilary Putnam And Immanuel Kant: Two 'Internal Realists'?
Since 1976 Hilary Putnam has drawn parallels between his ‘internal’, ‘pragmatic’, ‘natural’ or ‘common-sense’ realism and Kant’s transcendental idealism. Putnam reads Kant as rejecting the then current metaphysical picture with its in-built assumptions of a unique, mind-independent world, and truth understood as correspondence between the mind and that ready-made world. Putnam reads Kant as ove...
متن کاملE Pluribus Putnams Unum: Hilary Putnam and the Indispensability Argument
In this paper, I argue that the indispensability argument unifies all of Hilary Putnam’s diverse work in the philosophy of mathematics. I also argue that his version of the indispensability argument does not justify knowledge of mathematical objects. I first characterize indispensability arguments in the philosophy of mathematics, distilling them to four essential characteristics. I show that t...
متن کاملOn Putnam
Hilary Putnam has made major contributions to philosophy of mind and philosophy of language. In philosophy of mind, he developed the theories of multiple instantiability and functionalism. In philosophy of language, a major contribution of his is semantic externalism. This paper will give a very brief overview of multiple instantiability and functionalism, and then describe semantic externalism...
متن کاملPutnam and Constructibility *
I discuss and try to evaluate the argument about constructible sets made by Putnam in “Models and Reality”, and some of the counterarguments directed against it in the literature. I shall conclude that Putnam’s argument, while correct in substance, nevertheless has no direct bearing on the philosophical question of unintended models of set theory. MSC2000: 00A30, 03A05, 03E45.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Revista de filosofía DIÁNOIA
سال: 1983
ISSN: 1870-4913,0185-2450
DOI: 10.22201/iifs.18704913e.1983.29.797